"If he's alive, no crucifixtion, no resurrection."Yeah, two conclusions, both making assumptions of the other, but where did the holes in his hands come from. And the guy agrees that he was on the cross (arguments regarding broken legs, thieves on the cross...) This guy's logic is so flawed it's pitiful.He's also blaspheming the Injil.
Be time he got to point #4 he was talking about things that happened AFTER the resurection. Of course he was alive!!!
Post a Comment